Qubitro vs. Azure IoT
Microsoft Azure offers a powerful suite of IoT solutions, including IoT Hub, IoT Central, and related services. However, recent deprecations (such as the accelerated retirement of Time Series Insights) and uncertainty over other services (like IoT Central’s mistakenly announced retirement) have introduced confusion for users. Qubitro provides a stable, specialized alternative that makes it easier to manage and scale IoT projects while avoiding the complexity and potential disruptions associated with Azure’s evolving IoT roadmap.
The Qubitro vs. Azure IoT Story
Azure’s IoT portfolio was once considered one of the most comprehensive in the market—covering device provisioning, analytics, visualization, and more. But in recent years, various IoT services within the Azure ecosystem have been restructured, downgraded, or even retired.
- Time Series Insights: Officially being retired by July 7, 2024, forcing customers to migrate critical data and analytics pipelines on short notice.
- IoT Central: Briefly seemed at risk of deprecation in early 2024 due to an “in error” announcement. Although Microsoft walked back that statement, it left many users uneasy and questioning Microsoft’s long-term IoT focus.
- Reduced Investment: Multiple reorganizations at Microsoft have led to layoffs in IoT teams, slowing down feature updates and casting doubt on the future of remaining IoT services.
In contrast, Qubitro is laser-focused on IoT and maintains a clear, stable roadmap. Its mission is to provide a frictionless path from device connection to data-driven insights—without the overhead of a constantly shifting service portfolio. Qubitro doesn’t require you to stitch together multiple services, nor does it risk sudden feature losses or deprecations.
What We Have in Common
- Global Infrastructure: Both Qubitro and Azure operate in multiple regions, ensuring global availability and resilience.
- Scalability: Whether you manage a handful of devices or a massive connected fleet, both platforms can scale to meet growing IoT demands.
- Core IoT Features: Functions like device provisioning, telemetry ingestion, and secure connectivity are available on both.
How We Differ
1. Platform Stability and Predictability
- Azure IoT: Microsoft’s shifting priorities have led to confusion and forced migrations (e.g., Time Series Insights retirement). Some services remain in long-running preview status with no firm roadmap.
- Qubitro: Specializes solely in IoT. Stable, regularly updated platform with a clear product roadmap—lowering the risk of sudden service discontinuations.
2. Simplicity and Speed
- Azure IoT: Configuring solutions often requires multiple services (IoT Hub, Functions, databases, etc.), each with its own complexity and billing meter.
- Qubitro: Delivers out-of-the-box workflows for connecting devices, storing data, and building dashboards, reducing time-to-market from weeks to days—or even hours.
3. Ease of Migration
- Azure IoT: Deprecations often force rushed migrations. Integrating or pivoting to alternative solutions can be time-consuming and costly.
- Qubitro: Offers straightforward MQTT connectivity and developer-friendly SDKs, making it easy to migrate existing IoT solutions without overhauling your entire architecture.
4. Cost Transparency
- Azure IoT: While offering a pay-as-you-go model, costs can skyrocket as you piece together multiple services. Pricing can be complex due to layered, tier-based billing.
- Qubitro: Streamlined pricing with a clear breakdown of usage, so you always know what you’re paying for—no hidden surprises from ancillary services.
Features Side-by-Side
| Feature | Qubitro | Azure IoT |
|---|---|---|
| Setup Time | Minutes—simple, guided onboarding | Can range from days to weeks, depending on complexity |
| Managed Storage | Included, efficient, and scalable | Requires configuring services like Storage Accounts, Cosmos DB, or SQL DB |
| Device Management | Intuitive, with pre-configured templates | Powerful but often requires multiple Azure services (IoT Hub, IoT Central) |
| Functions / Rules | Ready-to-use, automated event processing | Custom setup via Azure Functions, Event Grid, or Logic Apps |
| No-Code Integrations | Quick workflows via a broad range of built-in connectors | Limited no-code scope, heavier reliance on other Azure services |
| MQTT Connectivity | Simplified and fully managed | Available through IoT Hub, but can require extra setup |
| APIs and SDKs | Developer-friendly, minimized friction | Feature-rich, but can be complex to implement |
| Dashboards | In-app, fully customizable and included | IoT Central offers some dashboards; otherwise, rely on Power BI, etc. |
| White-Labeling | Extensive branding options for customer-facing solutions | Possible via IoT Central, but uncertain future |
| Pricing | Straightforward, project-based tiers | Potentially complex, spans multiple services and usage models |
| Billing | Consolidated, transparent, no hidden fees | Fragmented; each service has separate fees or tiered pricing |
| Longevity & Updates | Single-focus IoT roadmap with consistent improvements | Some services are being retired; others have uncertain long-term support |
Why Qubitro is a Better Alternative
- Reduced Risk: No sudden service discontinuations or forced migrations—Qubitro’s business revolves solely around delivering a stable IoT platform.
- Fast and Flexible: Set up devices, process data, and build dashboards rapidly without bouncing between multiple services.
- Cost-Effective: A consolidated platform often translates to lower overall spending and simplified billing.
- Developer and User-Friendly: Simple APIs and an intuitive UI let you get projects running fast; perfect for both beginners and seasoned IoT pros.
- Migration-Friendly: If you’re worried about an uncertain Azure IoT roadmap, Qubitro’s MQTT support and out-of-the-box integrations make it easy to migrate without losing core functionalities.
Ready to try Qubitro?
Start building your IoT solution today with our free trial.
